The program looks at loops for each note in the scale: sometimes the loops that pass through one note are different than those that pass through a different note. Experimenting with this program, I see that happening sometimes. For this particular 90 note subset of 270edo, each note has the same set of loops:
- | 12 -2 -1 -1 0 -1 > = 4096:4095
- | -7 -1 2 0 -1 2 > = 4225:4224
- | -10 -1 -1 1 0 3 > = 15379:15360
- | 2 1 -1 -3 1 1 > = 1716:1715
This 90 note subset is symmetric: the 270 notes of the tuning system are divided into 10 blocks of 27 notes each. The scale picks out 9 notes from each block, at the same positions in each block. I ran the program with only 8 notes per block: then the sets of commas traversable had a basis of three instead of four commas. When I increased the number of notes per block, some notes had a basis set of five commas. So 9 notes per block does seem like a nice threshold.
Another scale I have explored at some point - I don't remember when! - is a 21 note scale in 72edo, generated by the semitone 16:15. 72edo works well with primes 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11, but not with 13. So I ommitted 13 in this analysis. Again, all the notes in the scale had the same space of commas traversable:
- | -10 1 0 3 0 > = 1029:1024
- | -5 2 2 -1 0 > = 225:224
- | -7 -1 1 1 1 > = 385:384

No comments:
Post a Comment